Consolidation divide Wednesday, January 11, 2006 12:00
am
Most city workers favor one
government; county workers wary
|
TOM DORSEY / Salina Journal
Ann Zimmerman (left) and
John Divine (right) listen as David Norlin discusses the
possibility of consolidating Salina and Saline County
governments during Tuesday’s League of Women Voters
Lunch and Learn program at St. John’s Lutheran Church.
They are mem | |
|
By
DARRIN STINEMAN Salina
Journal
|
|
Saline County employees aren’t all that jazzed about the prospect
of consolidating city and county government, according to a survey
the League of Women Voters conducted as it investigates the issue
for Salina and Saline County.
When asked if consolidation would make local government more
effective, eight county employees said yes. Forty-seven said no.
When asked what type of effect consolidation might have on their
job, two said positive, 33 said negative and 27 gave a neutral
response.
On the other hand, city of Salina employees said consolidation
would make government more effective — by a 28-15 count — and more
than two-thirds of them didn’t think it would have a negative effect
on their job.
500 workers get surveys
The study committee provided 500 surveys to the city of Salina
and 300 to Saline County, and it received responses from 72 city
employees and 68 from the county.
“It’s unmistakable that the results were more positive toward
consolidation from city employees than from county employees,” David
Norlin, a member of the League of Women Voters committee that’s
studying the issue, said during the league’s Lunch and Learn event
Tuesday.
The surveys also provided space for comments, and they tended to
reflect skepticism from county employees.
“We need to concentrate our efforts on finding more jobs, not
trying to take jobs away,” one wrote. “Until someone has lost a job,
you wouldn’t understand the impact it has.”
What about the county?
An employee with the Saline County Sheriff’s Office was concerned
about how consolidation might affect coverage of outlying areas.
“We provide law enforcement for all those smaller towns in the
county. In fact, we are the only law enforcement in those towns,”
the responder wrote. “Those smaller towns would get the short end of
the stick with consolidation.”
Another simply said: “This is a very tired subject. Let’s move
on.”
Ann Zimmerman, a member of the consolidation study committee,
said the committee is looking
at Wyandotte County —
the only Kansas locale to completely consolidate city and county
governments — as well as Topeka-Shawnee County, where residents
voted down consolidation last month.
“Topeka did an extensive study,” Zimmerman told a group of about
35 people who attended the noonhour event. “Apparently, they found
that consolidation would improve the economy of both the city and
the county, but they weren’t able to convince the majority of county
residents it would be to their benefit.”
State law required that both Topeka residents and those living
outside the city limits in Shawnee County approve of the
consolidation plan. More than 70 percent of Topekans approved, but
only 40 percent living outside the city voted for it.
The League of Women voters committee is hoping to gather enough
information to make a recommendation to the league’s board of
directors at its annual meeting in April, committee member Jan
Mendell said. The board would then consider making a recommendation
to state and local officials that consolidation be considered.
“We’re not trying to build a case either for or against
consolidation,” said committee member John Divine.
Divine’s desire to explore consolidation was a constant theme
during his unsuccessful campaign to unseat County Commissioner Craig
Stephenson in 2004.
“If we’re going to have good government, we need to maintain
openness to look at new approaches,” said Divine, whose wife,
Debbie, is Salina’s mayor.
It’s inevitable
Salinan Don Timmel, who attended the event, said he is acquainted
with the president of the Kansas Speedway in Wyandotte County, and
he claims that project may not have happened without consolidation.
“Why they got the track was (track developers) were dealing with
one government, one set of rules,” Timmel said.
Consolidation in much of Kansas is inevitable, he said.
“We need to study this further,” he said. “In fact, when it’s all
said and done, everyone working on this better have in mind it’s for
the betterment of us in central Kansas, in our little neighborhood
here.”
Commissioners care
John Burchill asked if a governing body for Salina and Saline
County would have district representation. Committee members said
it’s too early to say.
“When I had problems in the city and I tried to contact city
commissioners, at that time they all lived in a four-block radius of
each other, and they weren’t interested in my neighborhood,” said
Burchill, who used to live in Salina but has resided outside the
city limits for about 15 years.
“My county commissioner, when I mentioned an issue on my road,
knew what I was talking about and goes out and checks the roads all
the time.”
Consolidation talks
The League of Woman Voters of Salina is sponsoring a public
meeting to discuss statewide city-county consolidation:
WHEN: 7 to 8:30 p.m. Thursday
WHERE: Salina Public Library, Prescott room (basement)
PANEL MEMBERS: David Kerr, Don Moler and Sandy Jacquot
TO LEARN MORE: Call 825-7847, e-mail David Norlin at
davidnor@sbcglobal.net or go to www.lwvofsalinaks.com
• Reporter Darrin Stineman can be reached
at 822-1416, or by e-mail at
sjdstineman@saljournal.com.
©2005 Salina Journal
DISCUSS STORY 
PRINTER
FRIENDLY 
EMAIL
TO A FRIEND 
|