City candidates agree - except on housing authority
Thursday, March 29, 2007 11:24 am
By DARRIN STINEMAN
Salina Journal
|
|
If
you're looking for a Salina City Commission candidate who supports a
comprehensive water conservation plan, building a new swimming pool,
enacting a more stringent nonsmoking ordinance and looking at ways to
reduce redundancy between city and county government, it's going to be
tough to go wrong at the polls on Tuesday.
Candidates generally agreed with one another's views at
Wednesday night's League of Women Voters and Salina Area Chamber of
Commerce candidate forum at the chamber office -- although there was
some division when asked what the city's role should be in addressing
spending and management issues at the Salina Housing Authority.
Jerry Hinrikus of Radio Central, part of a three-member media
panel that posed questions to the six candidates, mentioned a recent
series of Salina Journal stories regarding the housing authority and
asked whether the city should have more oversight in the federally
funded agency's operation.
The strongest response in opposition to city intervention came from Aaron Peck, who finished third in the primary election.
"I'm going to say it's not really up to the city commission to
have a whole lot of oversight on the housing authority," Peck said.
"It's a federal agency that receives funding from federal tax dollars
and rent. I'm not sure it's the city commission's place to have any
oversight in that area."
The three candidates who finished behind Peck in the primary
and will need to move past him to earn one of the three open city
commission seats said they would like to see the city take an active
role in the situation.
"I do believe the city commission should be more involved in
that," said Barb Shirley, who finished fifth in the primary election.
"That is federal money that's being spent. Any use of taxpayers' money,
I think, should be investigated and looked into, and action should be
taken."
Diana Dierks, who finished fourth in the primary, said she would like to see the city examine the matter.
"It's something that should've been looked into sooner," she
said. "I really feel as a city, when we're dealing with taxpayers'
money, we have to be accountable for where it's going and that it's not
being used unethically or without some kind of guidance. I would
certainly be a proponent of looking into that situation as a city
commissioner."
Luci Larson, who finished a close second in the primary to lone
incumbent Abner Perney, said: "I think at first sight of a question or
a challenge, I think people sometimes are a little bit intimidated,
afraid to speak up and challenge it and ask questions. I think this
will serve as a lesson for those that are currently on boards or future
board members on any types of boards that receive our hard-working tax
money. Whenever you have a suspicion or a question, you have to
challenge it." Mary Douglass, who finished sixth in the primary, said: "I
think the city commission needs to take a very much more active
oversight of the housing authority. When I look at the salary of the
director of $90,000, I think how many houses could be renovated,
upgraded for that money, and that use of taxpayer funds is coming out
of my pocket and your pocket. I want to make sure we make the very best
use of taxpayer money."
Perney, who was elected to the city commission in 2004, was
director of the housing authority in the 1990s and worked for the U.S.
Department of Housing and Urban Development for several years prior to
that.
"I'm probably the most qualified person in this room, in this
city, to talk about that, and I could easily talk about it for an hour
or more, and it probably deserves an hour's discussion," Perney said.
"We haven't had that opportunity yet on the city commission."
Perney said some cities -- Topeka and Wichita among them --
have departments that run housing authorities rather than having them
as separate entities with city-appointed board members, which is the
case in Salina.
"There is some evidence that our board members could have done
some things and our executive director could've done some things
differently," Perney said. "But in a word, no, it's not necessarily
better for a housing authority to be a city agency directly."
Conservation of water
The candidates were practically of one voice on other issues.
They have been pelted with questions regarding Salina's water
shortage numerous times since campaigns for the primary election began,
and conservation remained the main theme when they addressed the matter
on Wednesday.
Douglass called for xeriscaping -- the use of plants and
grasses that require little water -- and low-flow appliances to become
the norm.
"I think we need to rethink our conservation efforts and to
educate people that buffalo grass is more beautiful than fescue," she
said.
Peck said he would support raising water rates for those who use more than a specified amount.
"Water's not a cheap commodity," he said, "and I think we need to price it as such."
Shirley said: "I want to go into the schools and teach children
to conserve water, and they in turn will teach their parents how to
conserve water."
Regarding city-county consolidation -- another topic the
candidates have been hit with numerous times -- the general consensus
was that it's worth looking into, but full-blown consolidation probably
isn't the answer.
"I don't ever see us having city-county consolidation 100 percent," Larson said. "I don't think it will work."
Perney pointed out that the city already has 44 agreements with the county that are designed to reduce redundancy.
Candidates also were in agreement that the city must do
something soon to replace its dilapidated, 50-year-old swimming pool.
The main difference was that Douglass called for building an
indoor-outdoor facility with a retractable roof so it could be used
year-round.
The candidates also showed unanimous support for expanded bike
trails and enacting a clean-air ordinance that would go beyond the
current one that forbids smoking in restaurants between certain hours.
"If secondhand smoke and other pollutants are bad for you from
5 in the morning to 9 at night, why are they suddenly good for you from
9 at night to 5 in the morning?" Douglass said. "I have often wondered
why we don't have a 24-hour ban."
n Reporter Darrin Stineman can be reached at 822ÂÂ-1416 or by e-mail at sjdstineman@saljournal.com.
©Salina Journal
DISCUSS STORY 
PRINTER FRIENDLY 
EMAIL TO A FRIEND 
|